seeno.ai
Compare

Compare AI visibility tools

Everyone in this category says they track your brand in AI answers. The differences that actually change your decision are narrower than the marketing, and there are four of them.

Run a free audit See pricing

Measured across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Claude.

Four questions that separate these tools

Ask every vendor on this page, including us. The answers vary far more than the home pages do.

What to compare, and where we stand
Question Why it changes your decision Seeno
Which engines, on which plan? A brand invisible in one engine and fine in four has a fixable problem. A tool that puts engines behind tiers hides exactly that. All 5 on every plan: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Claude.
How often is a question asked, and is it repeated? Answer engines are not deterministic. One run is an anecdote, and a tool that reports a single run as a fact is selling you noise. Weekly for the whole pool, daily for priority questions, each weekly question asked 2 times.
Do you get the raw answers or only a score? The text is where the useful part lives: what the engine believes about your category and which pages it read to get there. Full answer text kept, with the cited sources where the engine showed them.
Is the method published? Anyone can draw a leaderboard. The test is whether the maker will show the questions and the raw counts behind it. Published in full on whole industries, over a thousand answers each.
What are you charged for? Per seat means your team stops looking at it. Per engine means you drop the engine where you are weakest, which is the one that mattered. Per tracked question. Unlimited seats, no per-engine fee, from $149 a month.

The tools buyers compare us with

Each line is the vendor describing themselves on their own home page, read on 14 September 2026. We do not restate their prices or engine lists here, because a stale number about somebody else is a claim, not a comparison. Follow the link for their current word.

In their own words, 14 September 2026
Tool How they describe themselves
Profound Profound helps brands gain visibility in AI-generated answers, optimize their presence in LLM-based answer engines, and stay competitive.
Peec AI Peec AI helps marketing teams analyze brand performance across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Track visibility, benchmark competitors.
Scrunch AI Monitor brand presence in AI search, analyze and optimize your website, and deliver content directly to AI agents.
AthenaHQ A leading AEO and GEO platform trusted by commercial and enterprise businesses to become the answer AI gives.
Rank Prompt Track your brand across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Claude, Gemini and Grok. AEO and GEO tools to win AI search visibility and citations.
Otterly AI AI search monitoring tool: track ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews.
Ahrefs Brand Radar Map your full AI funnel across 6 AI tools. Breadth from search-backed prompts, depth from custom prompts.
Evertune Own the AI customer journey.

Where Seeno is the wrong choice

If you are a large enterprise buying breadth of analytics, executive dashboards and a procurement process to match, the bigger platforms on this page are built for that and we are not. If you need a single engine measured very deeply and nothing else, a narrower tool will be cheaper. If your market is North America and Arabic means nothing to you, our best argument disappears.

What we are built for is a company selling into the UAE and the wider Gulf that wants English and Arabic measured side by side, every engine included at every price, the raw answers kept, and a maker who publishes the method.

The head to head with the name that comes up most often is on its own page: Seeno versus Profound. The published measurements are at research.seeno.ai.

Compare on your own category

Run the measurement before you pick a tool

30 questions, 5 engines, free, no payment details.

Run a free audit

Questions

Before you ask us

Why does this page not list competitor prices?
Because a price copied from somebody else and left to rot is a claim we would have to defend. The tools here change pricing often and several publish nothing at all. Every line above is the vendor describing themselves on their own home page, read on 14 September 2026, with a link so you can check it yourself.
Which of these is best?
That depends on which of the criteria below you actually care about, and the honest answer for a large enterprise buying breadth of analytics is often not us. We are strongest for a company selling into the UAE that wants Arabic and English measured together, wants every engine on every plan, and wants to read the raw answers rather than a score.
Do you publish your own method?
Yes, with the exact questions and the raw counts, on whole industries rather than a demo account. That is the one criterion we would push any buyer to apply to every vendor on this page, ourselves included.
Something here about us is wrong. What now?
Write to us and it gets corrected or removed. A comparison page that a named company cannot get fixed is an advertisement pretending to be a comparison.
Keep reading

The rest of the product, in plain pages

AI visibility tracking

What we measure, how a buyer question becomes a number, and what a report holds.

ChatGPT brand monitoring

How answers from one engine are sampled, and why a mention is not a citation.

AI competitor tracking

Who gets named when you are not, question by question.

AI visibility audit

A free first measurement. Thirty questions, five engines, no payment details.

Seeno vs Profound

Where each is stronger, written plainly and without invented numbers.

For agencies

Client workspaces, white-label reports and the plan that carries them.

For marketing teams

Who reads the report every week and how it sits next to rank tracking.

Pricing

Every plan, every add-on and the service tier, in US dollars.